Instant Checkmate
Criminal-record and social-profile search option.
View RecordsUse Rhode Island’s public court portal, identify the limits of remote docket access, and continue to courthouse documents or an authorized BCI request.
Open the Rhode Island Judiciary Public Portal through Judiciary eServices and locate the docket or register of actions.
The Judiciary access rules explain that courthouse terminals in the clerks’ offices provide public electronic case information beyond the remote public docket, subject to sealed/confidential limits.
Use the Rhode Island Attorney General BCI service. The BCI is the state background-check product; it is not merely a printout of every court docket.
The Superior Court has original jurisdiction over felony proceedings, so the court record is the place to inspect the prosecution itself.
The Attorney General says the state report reflects fingerprint-supported arrests that resulted in a criminal conviction or equivalent disposition.
Fingerprint-supported arrests still pending prosecution at the time of the inquiry are also included.
The state guidance says the included records can involve misdemeanors and felonies.
The state explains that qualifying entries can reflect guilty or nolo pleas, guilty verdicts, guilty filings, not-guilty filings and deferred sentences until those dispositions are sealed or expunged as applicable.
| Not included in the state BCI | Why the limitation matters |
|---|---|
| Arrests no longer pending that did not result in a qualifying conviction/equivalent | Attorney General guidance says these are omitted. A missing BCI entry cannot be used to claim an arrest never occurred. |
| Federal arrests | The state BCI is Rhode Island-focused, not a federal history report. |
| Arrests outside Rhode Island | Out-of-state events fall outside the state BCI’s published scope. |
| Sealed or expunged records | The Attorney General says court-ordered sealed/expunged records do not appear in the BCI. Public-access rules also restrict sealed case information. |
The Rhode Island Judiciary says remote public users receive the register of actions or docket. That chronology lists parties, case events and filings, but remote public access does not include every electronic case document. The Attorney General BCI applies a separate inclusion rule, so differences between the two sources can be legitimate.
Use enough identifiers to distinguish people with similar names before reporting that a docket or BCI entry belongs to the subject.
This allows a history entry to be traced back to the prosecution that generated it.
Use the final court event or judgment rather than equating an initial charge with a conviction.
If a record is sealed, expunged or otherwise unavailable to the public, state the access limitation rather than describing the hidden content.
Label the source “Rhode Island BCI,” “Public Portal docket,” or “court document.” Those labels preserve the actual evidentiary scope.
If an employer, licensing process, volunteer organization or other recipient asks for a BCI, follow the Attorney General’s BCI instructions and do not substitute a court-search screenshot.
If the reader needs to know what happened in a criminal prosecution, use the Judiciary portal and, where necessary, the relevant clerk/courthouse terminal for public case material.
For a felony prosecution, confirm the Superior Court case because that court has original felony jurisdiction in Rhode Island.
When BCI and court data differ, examine scope, timing, sealing/expungement and identity before making a conclusion. The two systems were built for different public-record tasks.